E-readers or good old paper? Which is better for the environment?

We can blame it on the digital age or the time of quarantine due to covid, but the way we read has changed. More and more often, we consume books digitally, while some of us use e-readers instead of buying printed books. This change in behavior could be considered better for the planet – after all, by not destroying any trees.

However, this is not the only reason to use e-readers. Did you know that approximately 26% of all waste on the planet is paper and cardboard. It is clear that we do not recycle enough and are still far from it. not as much as predicted by many people responsible for this area. It's true that paper breaks down on its own, but it takes time, and the ink used to print it can be dangerous and harmful to the soil and water that flows through it.

On the other hand, according to numerous studies, the production of an electronic device means a larger carbon footprint. In 2010, the New York Times announced that almost 15 kilograms of minerals and just under 300 liters of water are needed to produce a single e-reader, and of course the lifespan of the device is also limited.

Sustainable digital reading

Since 2010, many things have probably changed in the way e-readers are produced. It would be difficult to say or assert with certainty that today production is carried out in a completely sustainable manner, but some manufacturers are trying to achieve more visible changes.

Amazon's 2022 Kindle was the first to use up to 75% of recycled plastic and up to 90% of recycled magnesium for its casing. A little later in the same year, Amazon also produced the Kindle Scribe with similar percentages, as the larger model of the e-reader consisted of 48% of recycled plastic and 100% of recycled aluminum.

The Japanese-Canadian brand Kobo has gone one step further on the path of sustainability. The first device they released that was made from recycled materials was the Kobo Clara 2E - at čemer E represents eco origin. According to Kobo's publicly available data, the device's casing was constructed from 80% of recycled plastic, 10% of which was ocean-harvested. It was the same with the Kobo Elipsa 2E models. This year's models of their e-reader are definitely winners in the field of sustainable approach – Kobo Libra Colour, Clara Color and Clara BW are not only largely based on the use of recycled plastic, 100% the packaging is also recycled. As an interesting fact, we should add that for the pictures and text on the packaging, they used soy paint, which is biodegradable.

Like other electronic devices, e-readers have a limited lifespan – on average, you will use a Kindle or Kobo for 6-8 years, and in certain cases you can exceed 10 years of use. Kobo is working hard to extend the life of its devices, and the 2024 models may become the most repairable e-readers available today.

To date, there has not been much research on which reading habits are more sustainable. There are a handful of studies and a 2021 article published in the “Journal of Library & Information Science Research” that tried to compare the information to see if e-reading is more sustainable †“ the results were not complete. So, for the more environmentally conscious reader, which option should you choose?

Choosing one of the latest Kobo e-readers can be a good start, and despite some of the non-renewable materials used in its construction, a 2009 report suggests that using the e-reader might be a greener option. At the time, it was estimated that over the lifetime of a single Kindle DX device, which was the most popular e-reader at the time, around 168 kilograms of carbon dioxide were produced.

Although this is a high number, it is approximately 1,074 kilograms of CO2 produced if you were to buy just three printed books every month for four years, which is also a huge number. Depending on how long the e-reader lasted, it could offset up to 26,000 kilograms of CO2 emissions during its lifetime. Even if you are not a regular reader, an e-reader can still have a lower carbon footprint than paper books.

But there are other reading habits that you can develop, which makes "digital reading" a more environmentally friendly choice than buying classic books. For starters, borrowing e-books and digital magazines from the library instead of buying new ones in print not only means that less paper is used, but it also saves money on buying new books – digital or otherwise. So a "win-win" situation.

If you're someone who prefers to buy rather than borrow, an e-reader becomes a more eco-friendly option the more you read. than five 360-page books a year. If you don't read that much, then buying used printed books is a better alternative.

Regardless of which reading format you choose, the most important thing is to dispose of the books or the device thoughtfully.